Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Building and Environment ; 236, 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2305491

ABSTRACT

222-nm Far-UVC light is an emerging and promising tool for rapidly inactivating airborne pathogens. In this study, we experimentally evaluated the performance of a 222-nm Far-UVC upper-room disinfection system with a 15 W Far-UVC lamp in a full-scale chamber (11.9 m3). One gram-positive bacteria, namely Staphylococcus epidermidis and two gram-negative bacteria, namely Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica were selected for the experiments. The aerosolized bacteria were injected into the chamber and exposed to 222-nm Far-UVC light. The first-order decay rates of indoor bioaerosols concentration with and without Far-UVC treatment were estimated. According to the results, the 222-nm Far-UVC induced decay rates of three bacteria were 0.0611 ± 0.003, 0.409 ± 0.048, and 0.474 ± 0.015 min−1, respectively. Besides, the UV susceptibility constants (Z-values) of these three bacteria were estimated as 0.157, 0.974, and 1.18 m2/J, respectively. The gram-positive bacteria, S. epidermidis, showed higher resistance to Far-UVC light as compared to the gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and S. enterica. In addition, a case study on airborne SARS-CoV-2 indoor transmission was simulated, and the infection risk of SARS-CoV-2 was compared using the Far-UVC and enhanced ventilation approaches. The results showed that both UV inactivation and ventilation approaches can significantly reduce the infection risk. More importantly, the Far-UVC may be a feasible and sustainable solution for reducing infection risk and improving indoor air quality. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd

2.
Applied Sciences (Switzerland) ; 13(3), 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2285294

ABSTRACT

Featured Application: An LED strip with 405 nm LEDs can be developed and installed in places such as inside the shelves in a retail store. The LED will provide continuous disinfection of the highly touched areas. Installing on the shelves will ensure faster disinfection, as the distance between the LED strip and surface will be approximately 10~20 cm. The ongoing coronavirus pandemic requires more effective disinfection methods. Disinfection using ultraviolet light (UV), especially longer UVC wavelengths, such as 254 and 270/280 nm, has been proven to have virucidal properties, but its adverse effects on human skin and eyes limit its use to enclosed, unoccupied spaces. Several studies have shown the effectiveness of blue light (405 nm) against bacteria and fungi, but the virucidal property at 405 nm has not been much investigated. Based on previous studies, visible light mediates inactivation by absorbing the porphyrins and reacting with oxygen to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). This causes oxidative damage to biomolecules, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, essential constituents of any virus. The virucidal potential of visible light has been speculated because the virus lacks porphyrins. This study demonstrated porphyrin-independent viral inactivation and conducted a comparative analysis of the effectiveness at 405 nm against other UVC wavelengths. The betacoronavirus 1 (strain OC43) was exposed to 405, 270/280, 254, and 222 nm, and its efficacy was determined using a median tissue culture infectious dose, i.e., TCID50. The results support the disinfection potential of visible light technology by providing a quantitative effect that can serve as the basic groundwork for future visible light inactivation technologies. In the future, blue light technology usage can be widened to hospitals, public places, aircraft cabins, and/or infectious laboratories for disinfection purposes. © 2023 by the authors.

3.
Sci Total Environ ; 869: 161848, 2023 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2211421

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has promoted interest in using devices emitting ultraviolet-C (UVC) irradiation (200-280 nm) for surface disinfection to reduce pathogen transmission, especially in occupied public spaces. While UVC devices have been shown to be highly effective against various pathogens, there are safety concerns when using conventional UVC devices for surface disinfection, including human exposure of reflected UVC irradiation and ozone generation. Emerging Far UVC devices (emitting at 200-230 nm), like the krypton chloride (KrCl*) excimer, have the potential to be safely applied in occupied spaces due to their minimal adverse effects on skin and eyes. In this study, UV reflection of 21 common materials was documented and compared using a filtered KrCl* excimer (installed with a bandpass filter at 222 nm), an unfiltered KrCl* excimer, and a conventional low-pressure mercury vapor lamp. The safety of Far UVC devices was evaluated based on the irradiance and spectrum of reflected UV irradiation and ozone generation measured at various locations around the device. Our results show that most common materials can reflect UV irradiation, among which some metals tend to have greater reflection. The Far UVC devices, especially the filtered KrCl* excimer, should be safe to be applied in occupied spaces for effective surface disinfection, with limited ozone generation and no health risk from reflected UV irradiation. However more caution is needed when using unfiltered KrCl* devices and conventional UV 254 nm light. This study provides urgently needed data on UV reflection of common materials and guidance for safety assessments of UVC devices for surface disinfection in occupied spaces.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disinfection , Humans , Disinfection/methods , Pandemics , Ultraviolet Rays , Skin
4.
Viruses ; 14(9)2022 09 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2033148

ABSTRACT

The current pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has encouraged the evaluation of novel instruments for disinfection and lowering infectious pressure. Ultraviolet subtype C (UVC) excimer lamps with 222 nm wavelength have been tested on airborne pathogens on surfaces and the exposure to this wavelength has been considered safer than conventional UVC. To test the efficacy of UVC excimer lamps on coronaviruses, an animal model mimicking the infection dynamics was implemented. An attenuated vaccine based on infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) was nebulized and irradiated by 222 nm UVC rays before the exposure of a group of day-old chicks to evaluate the virus inactivation. A control group of chicks was exposed to the nebulized vaccine produced in the same conditions but not irradiated by the lamps. The animals of both groups were sampled daily and individually by choanal cleft swabs and tested usign a strain specific real time RT-PCR to evaluate the vaccine replication. Only the birds in the control group were positive, showing an active replication of the vaccine, revealing the efficacy of the lamps in inactivating the vaccine below the infectious dose in the other group.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ultraviolet Rays , Animals , Chickens , Disease Models, Animal , Disinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Attenuated
5.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 39: 103015, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1937066

ABSTRACT

Ultraviolet (UV) light can inactivate SARS-CoV-2. However, the practicality of UV light is limited by the carcinogenic potential of mercury vapor-based UV lamps. Recent advances in the development of krypton chlorine (KrCl) excimer lamps hold promise, as these emit a shorter peak wavelength (222 nm), which is highly absorbed by the skin's stratum corneum and can filter out higher wavelengths. In this sense, UV 222 nm irradiation for the inactivation of virus particles in the air and surfaces is a potentially safer option as a germicidal technology. However, these same physical properties make it harder to reach microbes present in complex solutions, such as saliva, a critical source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We provide the first evaluation for using a commercial filtered KrCl excimer light source to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 in saliva spread on a surface. A conventional germicidal lamp (UV 254 nm) was also evaluated under the same condition. Using plaque-forming units (PFU) and Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID50) per milliliter we found that 99.99% viral clearance (LD99.99) was obtained with 106.3 mJ/cm2 of UV 222 nm for virus in DMEM and 2417 mJ/cm2 for virus in saliva. Additionally, our results showed that the UV 254 nm had a greater capacity to inactivate the virus in both vehicles. Effective (after discounting light absorption) LD99.99 of UV 222 nm on the virus in saliva was ∼30 times higher than the value obtained with virus in saline solution (PBS), we speculated that saliva might be protecting the virus from surface irradiation in ways other than just by intensity attenuation of UV 222 nm. Due to differences between UV 222/254 nm capacities to interact and be absorbed by molecules in complex solutions, a higher dose of 222 nm will be necessary to reduce viral load in surfaces with contaminated saliva.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Photochemotherapy , Disinfection/methods , Humans , Photochemotherapy/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Saliva , Ultraviolet Rays
6.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 55(1): 166-169, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1700704

ABSTRACT

This was a preliminary study on ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiation for SARS-CoV-2-contaminated hospital environments. Forty-eight locations were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR (33.3% contamination rate). After series dosages of 222-nm UVC irradiation, samples from the surfaces were negative at 15 s irradiation at 2 cm length (fluence: 81 mJ/cm2).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Disinfection , Humans , Ultraviolet Rays , Virus Inactivation/radiation effects
7.
International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD) ; : 67-68, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1557353

ABSTRACT

The AlGaN-based deep ultraviolet lightemitting diodes (DUV LEDs) for the disinfection of SARS-2 (Covid-19) are proposed in this study. The optoelectronic characteristics of DUV LEDs are numerically analyzed. The results show that the internal quantum efficiency (IQE) and radiative recombination rate are excellently improved in the proposed LED. This significant enhancement is due to the optimal recombination of electron- hole pairs in the active region. This is attributed to the increase of potential barrier height for electron, which suppress the electron leakage effectively. Moreover, due to the decrease of lattice mismatch between the last quantum barrier (LQB) and EBL ease the holes transportation to the active region. Therefore, based on these results, we highly believe that this study provides a novel approach for highly efficient DUV LEDs (222 nm) for the disinfection of severe SARS-2 (Covid-19) infection.

8.
GMS Hyg Infect Control ; 16: Doc07, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1107383

ABSTRACT

Background: The ongoing coronavirus pandemic requires new disinfection approaches, especially for airborne viruses. The 254 nm emission of low-pressure vacuum lamps is known for its antimicrobial effect, but unfortunately, this radiation is also harmful to human cells. Some researchers published reports that short-wavelength ultraviolet light in the spectral region of 200-230 nm (far-UVC) should inactivate pathogens without harming human cells, which might be very helpful in many applications. Methods: A literature search on the impact of far-UVC radiation on pathogens, cells, skin and eyes was performed and median log-reduction doses for different pathogens and wavelengths were calculated. Observed damage to cells, skin and eyes was collected and presented in standardized form. Results: More than 100 papers on far-UVC disinfection, published within the last 100 years, were found. Far-UVC radiation, especially the 222 nm emission of KrCl excimer lamps, exhibits strong antimicrobial properties. The average necessary log-reduction doses are 1.3 times higher than with 254 nm irradiation. A dose of 100 mJ/cm2 reduces all pathogens by several orders of magnitude without harming human cells, if optical filters block emissions above 230 nm. Conclusion: The approach is very promising, especially for temporary applications, but the data is still sparse. Investigations with high far-UVC doses over a longer period of time have not yet been carried out, and there is no positive study on the impact of this radiation on human eyes. Additionally, far-UVC sources are unavailable in larger quantities. Therefore, this is not a short-term solution for the current pandemic, but may be suitable for future technological approaches for decontamination in rooms in the presence of people or for antisepsis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL